ZAMBIA, Nov. 10 - I wish to commend the Environmental Council of
Zambia for sponsoring the "Environmental Newsmaker Forum" held at
Holiday Inn on November 8, 2023 to discuss the nagging problem of
unprecedented levels of garbage in Lusaka city. Since I could not
partake in the discussion, I have found it hard to resist the
temptation of making a brief comment relating to the same issue through
Zambezi Times Online (ZTO).
1. INTRODUCTION.--Solid waste, like air and water pollution, is a form
of environmental pollution that is mainly a by-product of human
activities. As such, it is an inescapable problem in every human
society. It is, by and large, a culmination of discarded products or
parts of products--including broken and non-reusable bottles, metal
cans, plastic sacks and containers, newspapers, and automobile parts
and bodies.
Lusaka city, like many other cities in modern Zambia, is currently
experiencing serious problems at all stages of solid-waste
management--that is, the collection, sorting, transportation, and
disposal of garbage. The seriousness of this problem is summed up by
the UN Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) in an article
dated May 20, 2023 entitled "Zambia: Failure to Manage Urban Waste"
found at http://www.queensu.ca/ as follows:
"Heaped garbage, a choking smell and pools of stagnant water sum up the
state of Soweto market, the largest open-air trading area in Zambia's
capital ... [and] are a sign of how urban waste management has failed
in what was once called the `garden city' but is now cynically referred
to as `garbage city'".
2. A HEALTH HAZARD.--The accumulation of solid waste in the capital
city can be attributed to many factors, including the following: (a)
public attitudes that are alleged to be generally characterized by lack
of concern for the quality of surroundings; (b) failure by local
authorities to prioritize garbage collection and disposal; (c) lax
enforcement of by-laws relating to littering and other forms of
contamination in public surroundings; (d) rampant and uncontrolled
street vending; and (e) lack of financial and material resources
resulting from irregular support in the form of grants from the central
government.
But regardless of the reasons for the unprecedented accumulation of
solid wastes in Lusaka city--and in other urban and sub-urban centers
of Zambia, as a matter of fact--it is perhaps important to underscore
the fact that such wastes are a serious health hazard. For instance,
piles of uncollected solid-wastes facilitate the formation of pools of
stagnant water and create breeding grounds for mosquitoes and, as such,
dispose residents to the deadly malaria parasite.
Besides, outbreaks of cholera, meningitis and other contagious diseases
in the country have been directly linked to the absence of effective
solid-waste disposal systems, together with the lack of potable water
in some communities and unhygienic street-vending of foodstuff.
The congestion of people in the city's urban and sub-urban areas
occasioned by rural-to-urban migration has perhaps exacerbated the
potential for outbreaks of communicable diseases in such areas.
Inevitably, the potential health risks have become more profound and
mind-boggling given the city's lack of adequate resources to provide
for decent social services, public amenities and improved sanitary
conditions to unprecedented numbers of residents.
Members of the MANGOKA Secretariat--who represent the residents of
Marapodi, N'gombe and Kamanga residential areas in matters of refuse
collection and disposal, and public health and sanitation--would
perhaps provide us with a more precise and down-to-earth account of the
potential health hazards associated with high levels of solid wastes in
the capital city, whose sources include households and both commercial
and industrial undertakings.
3. POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS.--A viable and long-term solution to the problem
of solid-waste pollution is regular collection and recycling of all
forms of solid waste. For example, plastics, discarded metals, and
paper wastes can be collected and recycled into usable raw materials.
Another feasible solution to the problem of solid wastes is the
production of biodegradable products--that is, any products that are
made in such a way that they can be naturally broken down into elements
that are less harmful to the physical environment upon being disposed
of.
Moreover, making reusable products and parts of products can greatly
contribute to the mitigation of solid wastes. For example, containers
can be designed in such a way that they can be used for other purposes
once their original contents are exhausted. Junk yards are certainly
not a viable solution to the problem of solid-waste pollution because
they, among other reasons, take up areas that need to be reserved for
commercial, residential, recreational, and/or other worthwhile purposes.
Besides, it is essential for the Zambian government to require locally
based organizations to include environmental impact statements in their
business plans or corporate charters. Suggestively, such statements
need to incorporate the following, among other things: (a)
identification of potential impacts of their operations on the
environment; and (b) a description of measures they are geared to take
in managing these impacts to tolerable levels.
It is also important for the government to provide adequately for the
material and financial needs of the Environmental Council of Zambia,
which was created under the Environmental Protection and Pollution
Control Act of 1990 to protect the environment and control pollution so
as to provide for the health and welfare of persons, and the
environment as follows: coordination of environmental management;
promotion of awareness about the need to protect the fragile natural
environment; and enforcement of regulations pertaining to the control
and prevention of air, water and solid-waste pollution.
Further, inclusion of subjects or courses of study aimed at sensitizing
citizens to environmental issues and problems in the curricula of all
educational and vocational training institutions can lead to conduct
among citizens that is environmentally benign. To be effective, such
education needs to be interdisciplinary in nature; in other words, it
needs to be aimed at preparing citizens to be: (a) knowledgeable about
the interrelatedness of biophysical and socio-cultural environments of
which humans are a constituent part; (b) aware of environmental issues
and problems and of viable alternatives in resolving the issues and
problems; and (c) motivated to work voluntarily toward the protection
and improvement of the fragile natural environment.
At this juncture, let us reflect on the luck of material and financial
resources for addressing the nagging problem of solid-waste pollution
in Lusaka city in particular, and in the entire country in general.
In this regard, there is an urgent need for both the central government
and local authorities to seriously consider the prospect of shedding
off some of the top-level sinecures in their administrations,
instituting strict controls on both recurrent and capital expenditures,
and streamlining operations.
It is, for example, irresponsible for us, as a nation, to condone a
situation where the central government is composed of so many ministers
and deputy ministers. Have we ever asked ourselves how government
ministries continued to perform as before under the superintendence of
Permanent Secretaries after the Cabinet was dissolved prior to the 2006
tripartite elections? What difference, then, will the recent
appointments of ministers and deputy ministers make in terms of the
performance of government ministries?
I am generally impressed by the caliber of the current crop of
Permanent Secretaries; they are capable of advising the Republican
president on, and spearheading the implementation of, policies relating
to the government ministries they are expected to administer--a task
which one would expect current ministers and their deputies to perform,
but which most of them are not likely to perform adequately because
they do not possess the necessary knowledge and skills relating to the
overall missions and objectives of the government ministries to which
they are appointed.
Once we secure a constitutional proviso that will require the
Republican president to constitute his or her Cabinet from citizens who
are not MPs (non-politicians, that is), Republican presidents will have
the opportunity to fill Cabinet-level positions with technocrats.
By the way, do we really need District Commissioners in our quest to
provide adequately for public health and sanitation, education and
training, food security, public safety and security, and so forth?
Further, and without intentionally wishing to inflame controversy,
wouldn�t our National Assembly still be representative and able to
function effectively as the legislative organ of our national
government with only 72 elected Members of Parliament (MPs)--1 MP
elected from each of the existing 72 districts? Also, does the
Republican president really need to nominate 8 people to the National
Assembly? Why not 5 or less?
Meanwhile, the performance of essential public services like refuse
collection and disposal is left to the private initiative of
community-based organizations like the Marapodi Solid Waste Collection
Services, and private enterprises like the Copperbelt-based Asset
Holding Company--which provides municipal services in several mine
townships involving garbage collection, operation of disposal sites and
treatment of sewer.
Government leaders should be there not to function merely as
figureheads. More than ever before, our country needs leaders who are
change agents--leaders who are always on their tenterhooks searching
for ways and means of improving the livelihoods of their fellow
citizens, and applying scarce public resources with the utmost
frugality.
4. CONCLUSION.--While individuals and institutions need to be obliged
to tackle the pollution they directly generate, there is a need for the
creation of a partnership by the business community, non-profit
organizations, and both national and regional governments to deal with
environmental issues and problems for which no single organization or
societal member can be held responsible. Ideally, such a partnership
should, among other things, be based on voluntary self-help, that is,
without any undue reliance on any of the cooperating institutions.
Currently, there are a few cooperative endeavors in the capital city
which are making a positive impact on refuse collection and disposal in
particular, and on sanitation in general; they include the Sustainable
Lusaka Project (SLP) financed by Ireland Aid, and the Lusaka-Dayton
partnership created by the Lusaka City Council and the Dayton
municipality in Ohio, USA.
And one would do well not to slight the contributions being made
through the "Keep Lusaka Clean" campaign, the "Make Zambia Clean and
Healthy" campaign, the Zambian Red Cross Society door-to-door community
health-education campaign, the Lusaka Solid Waste Management Project
funded by the Danish Development Agency, the Resource Cities program
sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and
other non-government efforts directed at redressing the solid-waste
problem in particular, and enhancing public health and sanitation in
local communities nationwide in general.
Ultimately, the overall responsibility for ensuring that garbage is
collected, transported and disposed of in a safe and environmentally
friendly manner should be assumed by local authorities supported
materially and financially by the central government. This can be
achieved in any of the following ways: (a) through direct
local-government involvement in the exercise; (b) by engaging private
contractors through competitive bids; and/or (c) through both direct
local-government involvement and sub-contracting the garbage collection
and processing services in selected areas.
By Henry Kyambalesa
Agenda For Change
|